village voice
RSS/Podcast feed for Village Voice News Status Ain't Hood
Eerie Misanthropic Wednesday
City Gourmet
Win an Office Party from City Gourmet Eatery!
Latino Poets Society
Enter for your chance to win tickets to The Latino Poet’s Society Spoken Word Tour at The Cherry Lane Theater in Greenwich Village!
Jammin' with Jazz at Lincoln Center
Win admission for two to one performance at Dizzy's Club Coca-Cola, New York’s hottest jazz club, plus a collection of jazz CDs and more!
Carifest
Enter to win VIP tickets to the Carifests C.A.R.E.S AIDS Awareness Benefit Concert on Sunday, July 6th!
Bash'd
Enter to win tickets to a performance of Bash'd: A Gay Rap Opera!
News
Wall Street Takes Dead Aim at Affordable Housing in New York City
A new investment scheme is turning bankers into your ugly landlord
by Tom Robbins
May 20th, 2008 12:00 AM

Dhenise Oliveira was 20 years old when she and her husband, Marcos, moved into a one-bedroom apartment on 88th Street off of rumbling Roosevelt Avenue in Jackson Heights, Queens. That was 1992. The six-story apartment house "wasn't the greatest," she says. But the rent was reasonable, and the landlord largely complied with the law, providing the basics of heat and hot water, while collecting his annual rent hikes.

This kind of affordable housing is the city's rarest and most precious commodity. The way it works is that people like the Oliveiras pay a rent they can afford while working productively at their jobs. In Dhenise Oliveira's case, she works for the Customs Department. Her husband drives a bakery delivery truck. They paid the rent—$630 a month—while the landlord made a decent profit and paid his taxes. This is how a city functions.

To help meet the crisis in low-cost housing, Mayor Bloomberg has pledged to spend $7.5 billion. So far, he says, he has helped build or save some 71,000 units.

That's good, because the math here is clearly against us. Some 30,000 rent-regulated apartments are lost yearly due to rising rents. Now, Wall Street investors have devised a strategy poised to take an even bigger bite.

Under this approach, private investment firms, backed by large banks, purchase buildings in working-class neighborhoods and then aggressively challenge the identity of as many tenants as possible. The apparent aim here is to replace as many people as possible with higher-paying residents, while taking advantage of the lax enforcement of rental-housing laws.

So far, it appears to be working. The Association for Neighborhood and Housing Development reports that the turnover in many buildings purchased by these private-equity firms has been as high as 25 percent. Conveniently, this is the same vacancy goal cited in financing documents filed by one of the new firms, Vantage Properties, a company that has bought more than 9,200 units in the city in the last two years.

Once, the biggest fear on this terrain was slumlords whose conduct was so atrocious they won monickers like the "Devil Landlord" or "Vampire Landlord" in homage to their devious and vicious ways. But the new landlords are proving that you can drive more tenants away with lawyers and court papers than with baseball bats.

"They have created an eviction mill," says Robert McCreanor, an attorney for the Catholic Migration Office in Queens, who is battling Vantage in court on behalf of scores of tenants.

For their part, the new owners insist that they are improving long-neglected properties, while protecting their rights as owners by simply checking the legal status of questionable occupants. But consider the saga of Dhenise and Marcos Oliveira, who had lived happily in their little apartment for 16 years until Vantage purchased their building in October 2006.

That fall, Dhenise Oliveira gave birth to a baby girl. She got out of the hospital in early December and came home to a legal notice from the new landlord stating that her lease would not be renewed because she didn't really live there.

"The Premises are not being used as Tenants' primary residence," the notice stated. She and her husband really lived in another apartment in Woodside, Queens, on 32nd Avenue, it said.

Oliveira assumed this was a mistake. "I told them I lived nowhere else but this place since I am married. I said, 'Please double-check your information before accusing anybody.' "

In response to the new managers' demands, she presented her bills for telephone, gas, and electric, each showing her address at 37-37 88th Street. She also offered her lease from 2006, and her driver's license. The managers remained unmoved. I asked them, 'What makes you think we live in Woodside?' " Because that's where Marcos Oliveira lives, she was told.

"I told them, 'You know, guys, how many Marcoses are there in the world? It is ridiculous.' They just say, 'Ma'am, I am sorry.' "

Oliveira filed a complaint with the state's Division of Housing and Community Renewal that her landlord had improperly refused her a renewal lease. The landlord wasn't impressed. They still had to go, she was told.

"So, in frustration, what I decided to do was go and find this address where they said we really lived," said Oliveira. She knocked on the door at the apartment in Woodside and found a tall man whose name was also Marcos Oliveira. "He was Brazilian, like us," she said. "He had the same last name and first name."

The other Marcos Oliveira agreed to accompany the Oliveiras to the Vantage management office. There, the two Marcos Oliveiras presented themselves. One was about five feet, 11 inches. The other Marcos was over six feet, seven inches. "The manager asked, 'Who are you?' And the other Marcos says, 'I'm Marcos Oliveira.' They both showed their ID's. They said, 'See, we are different guys—different birth dates, different people.' "

The Oliveiras ultimately got their lease. But McCreanor, the housing attorney, has filed a lawsuit that is filled with similar instances of apparently over-eager accusations. One plaintiff is Nelis Fuentes, 75, who has lived in the 88th Street building for 21 years. Vantage has told her that it knows her real residence is in Miami, where another man with her ex-husband's name—Jose Fuentes—lives.

"How many Jose Fuentes are there in the country?" asked McCreanor. His lawsuit claims that such deceptive practices have become a Vantage trademark and should be barred under consumer-protection statutes.

Vantage's CEO, a real-estate veteran named Neil Rubler, didn't return calls. But the company has gone top-shelf in search of spokesmen and lobbyists, and Rubler's office directed callers to Bud Perrone, of Howard Rubenstein Associates. "The suggestion that Vantage brings baseless legal cases is 100 percent false," said Perrone in a statement.

On the political front, the company also recently engaged the city's top lobbyist, Suri Kasirer. It has done so, Perrone stated, because "at present, there is a great deal of misinformation going around about our business practices, and it is important that we seek every opportunity to set the record straight."

Most alarmingly, some of that alleged misinformation is being repeated by local elected officials who have condemned the company and its practices. "This is an outrage," says State Senator John Sabini, who joined a recent demonstration outside one of Vantage's banks, Credit Suisse. "They're just taking people with foreign-sounding names and claiming their leases are somehow wrong, hoping they'll leave." In recent days, Kasirer's office has contacted other politicians who have criticized the company, including Assemblyman Jose Peralta and City Councilman Eric Gioia.

Gioia has pledged to hold hearings on the impact of the new investment firms on the affordable-housing stock.

"When I look at their business plan and I see it is predicated on a 20 percent turnover, the only way you can do that is to have an orchestrated plan to force people out," said Gioia. "There's no other way to figure it."

More by Tom Robbins
A Slice of Mafia With Your Sparkling Water?
The city's king distributor of bottled beverages likes the wiseguys

A Colorful Look Back at Pre-Castro Cuba
Mobsters do the mambo

Home Alone—With Medicaid Fraudsters
In a $30 million home health-care scam, some well-connected names

The Flash Press Unearths a Pleasingly Salacious Era of New York City Sleaze
They loved this dirty town
The Flash Press: Sporting Male Weeklies in 1840s New York

Gifford Miller: Slush-Fund Refugee
While the council roils in scandal, the former Speaker stays mum, hangs with developer chum

Add a Comment

Not ? Login as a different user.

All reader comments are subject to our Terms of Use. By submitting a comment, you acknowledge that you have reviewed and agree to these Terms of Use.

Login or Register

Login or register to have a chance to win Free Stuff, subscribe to newsletters and much more!

Login Register
James Tremble on Sat May 31, 2008, 08:11, says:
LOL, Did I just see "affordable" and "new York City" in the same sentence? LOL, when pigs fly!

JJ

http://www.Privacy-Center.net
maxi1 on Wed May 21, 2008, 23:54, says:
But, you're argument is ridiculous. You apparently did not read the article or you would have known that this is not about evicting people for non-payment of rent. In fact that is not mentioned once, were talking about false accusations and a campaign of harassment against tenants with the explicit goal of getting rid of them for wealthier tenants. The same landlord who evicted the previous tenant will evict you if given the chance so they can hand it over to a wealthier tenant. Immigrants made this city what it is by living here when you would have been scared to, now landlords want to give them the boot and you as a newcomer have not bothered to educate yourself. Please look up the name Jane Jacobs and read a little before you post anymore comments. What did they teach you in that college?
BUT on Wed May 21, 2008, 13:17, says:
What this articles fails to address is that there is an even BIGGER NEED for middle income housing. As a recent college grad who lives in a newly renovated apartment in Harlem I'm glad my landlord kicked out the previous tenant who was not paying her rent. Where else would recent college grads live if it weren't for these landlords?

I say the loss of 30K units per year is a good start!!! Let's get rid of all of them!!!
Leonardo from the BLOCK on Wed May 21, 2008, 00:13, says:
You mention politicians NYS Assemblyman Jose Peralta, NYS Senate member John Sabini and City Councilman Eric Gioia. Absent from the list was NYC Councilman Hiram Monserrate, among his council districts most politically and socially active constituents are people who live in rent stabilized buildings now owned by Vantage Properties, LLC. Was he at the renters demonstration on April 12, 2008, in front of one of the companies major financial backers Credit Suisse in Manhattan? The answer is NO!!! NYS Assemblyman Jose R. Peralta was there, NYS Senate Member John Sabini was there, NYC Council Member Eric Gioia was there, and Steven Moyano representing NYS Assemblyman Ivan Lafayette's office was there. All were there, walking the line with us, "THE PEOPLE". Not only did Hiram Monserrate not attend the Vantage tenants meetings at Blessed Sacrament Church in Jackson Heights or the meeting at Saint Sabastine Church in Woodside, Queens, he didn't even have the political good sense to send a representative. I guess he was busy deflecting questions from federal, state, and city investigators looking into his tax money contributions he made to the bogus group LIBRE. (see NY Times April 28, 2008 NY/Region section). If not, he was probably meeting with Neil Rubler, CEO of Vantage. Taking his money, while Neil works his dirty business evicting immigrants,elderly, and families with children out of their apartments thru mere legal technicalities. On April 24, 2008, Vanatge placed flyers under the doors of tenants at 37-52 88th Street in Jackson Heights announcing a joint meeting in the lobby with Hiram Monserrate for April 28, 2008. His name and face appeared on the announcement. His office in Elmhurst was inundated with complaints from his constituents, that on April 28,2008 a new announcement appeared , this one read, "unfortunately Councilman Hiram Monserrate is unable to attend this evening's scheduled meeting due to an unforeseen circumstance. On behalf of Councilman Monserrate and Vantage Management, we apologize for any inconvenience this may caused..." Go figure! He is in Vantage's deep money pockets. No attendance in the meetings nor the protest, but he has time for public relations for a private equity financed group that is engaged in systematic harassment of his constituents. As I go around and speak to my neighbors and friends, I will have the paper proof in my hands. He will never get my vote, nor my families. He is relying on his belief that Latinos will be for him, not on the social and political issue of importance, but "Hey guys, I'm latino, so vote for me!" What a prick!!!


The Village Voice Ad Index
The Village Voice Guide To Atlantic City

» click here to see more...

The Village Voice Summer Guide 2008

» click here to see more...

The Village Voice Summer 2008 Education Supplement

» click here to see more...

The Village Voice Spring Arts Supplement

» click here to see more...