village voice
RSS/Podcast feed for Village Voice News Status Ain't Hood
Eerie Misanthropic Wednesday
City Gourmet
Win an Office Party from City Gourmet Eatery!
Latino Poets Society
Enter for your chance to win tickets to The Latino Poet’s Society Spoken Word Tour at The Cherry Lane Theater in Greenwich Village!
Jammin' with Jazz at Lincoln Center
Win admission for two to one performance at Dizzy's Club Coca-Cola, New York’s hottest jazz club, plus a collection of jazz CDs and more!
Carifest
Enter to win VIP tickets to the Carifests C.A.R.E.S AIDS Awareness Benefit Concert on Sunday, July 6th!
Bash'd
Enter to win tickets to a performance of Bash'd: A Gay Rap Opera!
Film
Indiana Jones and the Fortress of Sad Decline
Its very own temple of doom, Kingdom of the Crystal Skull digs Indy into a very deep hole
by Robert Wilonsky
May 20th, 2008 12:00 AM

The Old Indiana Jones Chronicles


David James/Paramount Pictures
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
Directed by Steven Spielberg
Paramount Pictures
Opens May 22

Here's your hat, Indy, but, really, what's your hurry? Because 19 years after the Last Crusade that clearly wasn't, and 15 years after the old man joined Young Indiana Jones on the small screen to recount his glory days blowing horns with Sidney Bechet, it's almost unfathomable that this hoary mishmash is the best that George Lucas and Steven Spielberg could cough up.

Have we learned nothing about disturbing dusty relics and mussing with primordial remains? These only lead to trouble—melted faces, some crazy dude sticking his fist in your chest, and, well, more melting faces. This time, though, an even worse fate lies ahead for trampling trespassers: National Treasure by way of The X-Files, only not as pleasurable as so dreadful a coupling would suggest. Bury thyself, Dr. Jones, and pray no one disturbs the corpse in this or any other millennium.

From humdrum start to shrugging finish, Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull bears almost no resemblance to its three predecessors: It's absent the spark and spirit of Raiders of the Lost Ark, the grown-up menace and slapdash comedy of Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, and the loose-limbed effervescence and emotional jolts of Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade. It's hard to tell whether Spielberg and Lucas are trying too hard or trying at all—the thing's such a mess, such an unmitigated disaster, that damned is the scholar stuck with the unfortunate task of deciphering this cynical, clinical gibberish in decades to come.

Much has been made of Lucas and Spielberg, and a cadre of screenwriters (including the solely credited David Koepp), pushing the franchise into the late 1950s—away from the Nazis and biblical collectors' items and toward the Russians and ETs. Early word suggested a film verging on summer camp, as creaky ol' Indy (Harrison Ford, looking not a day over 62) donned fedora and whip and Cate Blanchett slipped into dominatrix bob-cut bangs and borscht-scented accent for some outer-space trip flavored with the era's grade-Z conventions, just as the first films proffered yellowed pulp cliffhangers and widescreen smirks. But Crystal Skull is no fun at all—not for a single second, not even accidentally. Not even with Shia LaBeouf terribly miscast as Marlon Brando as the Wild One. (The Mild One? Sure, fine.)

The dialogue's drab when not absolutely dumb; the actors seem lost if not outright listless; the scant action sequences appear to have been filmed entirely in front of green screens, suggesting a movie shot during breaks from lunch catered in a studio boss's office. (Is anyone sure producer Lucas didn't actually direct?) And the storyline's a bunch of convoluted mumbo and pointless jumbo having to do with Russians and mind control and the mythical golden South American city of El Dorado, which, according to The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, may have been constructed by "visitors" who taught the locals how to, um, farm. Twenty years between offerings, and this is all that the A-team could come up with? Close Encounters of the Turd Kind?

Continue
More by Robert Wilonsky
Stuck: Disgusting Dark Comedy
Fatal accident humor, from the Re-Animator guy
Stuck

The Foot Fist Way: Truly Cringe-Tastic
Or at least star Danny McBride is in this tae kwon do comedy

Made of Honor: Total Autopilot
Patrick Dempsey is Hollywood's Great Chickenshit
Made of Honor

Tina Fey and Amy Poehler's Surrogate Mommy Comedy
Neither one seem the least bit invested in their baby
Baby Mama

Helen Hunt's Then She Found Me
Mad about crap
Then She Found Me

Add a Comment

Not ? Login as a different user.

All reader comments are subject to our Terms of Use. By submitting a comment, you acknowledge that you have reviewed and agree to these Terms of Use.

Login or Register

Login or register to have a chance to win Free Stuff, subscribe to newsletters and much more!

Login Register
Geoffrey on Tue Jun 3, 2008, 19:04, says:
Meow!

Seriously,what were you expecting Berlin Alexanderplatz? It's an escapist movie that mashed together some antique themes, just like the other ones. Anyway, you lost all credibility when you claimed that the runaway mining car was the best sequence in all of the franchise-- please, that was a blatant plug for the amusement park ride!
kak on Mon May 26, 2008, 20:28, says:
well, I'll be the coarse phillistine among all the believers here, but I'm not exactly sure how this faux-B-movie made in 2008 is substantially different than the originals, made in the eighties. Lucasfilms isn't exactly the pinnacle of cgi, but I thought that lent itself well to the demands of the film. I personally (and I will readily admit that the Indy films aren't any important part of my childhood) don't see what critiques leveled at this film (in terms of the craft of story and presentation) don't also apply to the originals. What "risks" did the originals take that makes this seem so bland, so hokey? When have the Indy films been about substance and depth as opposed to sometimes cartoony, sometimes graphic extravagant scenes, one after another? The aliens and the commies are, in my mind, only a stone's throw away from the nazis, the ark, the grail, a few glowing stones. I dunno. Just seems like a case of a culturally treasured series getting away from the original creators, just like all "art" that enters into popular culture and therefore collective ownership. Can Al Pacino or Robert DeNiro or Morgan Freeman be in a movie without parodying their classic, highly regarded past selves?
Johnny Pantalones on Mon May 26, 2008, 09:28, says:
The only thing that connects this awful movie to the previous Indiana Jones movies is that there's a guy named 'Indiana Jones' in it. Weak storyline. Horrible script. Underdeveloped characters. It was just one action scene after another loosely connected by a REALLY thin plot. I felt like I was watching Phantom Menace again. What a disappointment.
furyofthefilmfan on Sun May 25, 2008, 05:12, says:
If you didn't get shia was Indy's son simply by viewing the trailer then you're retarded.

This movie blew and if you need another opinion why check it out here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hahTj7K4S3E

The reviewer nailed why this movie sucked and anybody defending this mess is either a studio plant or someone with nostalgic blinders on.
Mike on Fri May 23, 2008, 15:27, says:
Borscht-scented accent? Yellowed pulp cliffhangers and widescreen smirks? Why must film critics always use such lame metaphors? Anyway, who cares that they made a 4th one when they said they wouldn't? Like I have anything better to do on Saturday night than get drunk and see Indy 4.
dcr3000 on Fri May 23, 2008, 11:16, says:
Thank you for this review. I went to the midnight opening and am still in shock at how bad this movie was. I know most people will not believe it, and will still go waste 2 hrs and $10, but at least they can't say they were'nt warned.
peter on Wed May 21, 2008, 15:18, says:
why did the village voice remove my comment? are you going to remove this negative review, too? anyway, i am glad this review is here -- it isn't great literature, but at least it tell me the voice hasn't been bought in the way the other papers have...
pete on Wed May 21, 2008, 15:02, says:
thank you for this review. spot on about Lucas; influences in bad cgi... i saw the film, and i have been feeling like i am in the twilight zone -- with all these good reviews out there.... did I see the same movie? If they spent 150 million on promotion, it's no wonder (but disappointing) the papers are giving good and soft reviews. The metacritics score has dropped from 78 to 67... so maybe it will continue to decline to accurately reflect what might be spielburg's most most miscalculated film since Always...
village voice readers suck on Wed May 21, 2008, 10:02, says:
oh please jerk off, don't flatter yourself. It seems most people read reviews to see if a movie is good or worth seeing, not to give a detailed plot summary. Plus it seems that your the only asshole that gave this movie a bad review. Academically approach a film to see why it works, how it effects people not give a detailed plot summary. Go to back to whatever journalism school. you half ass hack.This film received better rating from real film critics.Can you imagine Ebert telling you darth vader is luke father or who the killer is in Scream. i mean come on. Should all movie-goers be "wary" or avoid all film critics.If thats the case they would be all out of a job.
Poerba on Wed May 21, 2008, 08:34, says:
Oh please. If you're so wary of spoilers, why read reviews? What a crybaby.
Robert Wilonsky sucks on Wed May 21, 2008, 03:53, says:
Thanks ass for spoiling the movie for me by telling that indys a father 2 days before it shows in theaters. Next time give less detail. this guy should get fired.sequels will never be better then the original so stop your crying.


The Village Voice Ad Index
The Village Voice Guide To Atlantic City

» click here to see more...

The Village Voice Summer Guide 2008

» click here to see more...

The Village Voice Summer 2008 Education Supplement

» click here to see more...

The Village Voice Spring Arts Supplement

» click here to see more...